Posts from Data & Analytics

News from Molecular’s Data & Analytics practice.

November 9

How to Protect Your URL in a Social Media World

Co-authored by Yuval Zukerman, Sr. Consultant, Emerging Interactions, Molecular

Social media has come to play a key role in brand messaging, with the strong two-year climb of microblogging service Twitter adding a new twist: a 140-character limit. This restriction has pushed adoption of a few common ways to cram more message into less space. Apart from heavily leveraging the new language of texting shorthand born of the mobile SMS, the biggest trend in use is employing short URLs to save space while linking to other online content.

Short URLs are hinged on service providers like tr.im and TinyURL that allow people to generate unique links, usually formed of a small domain name followed by a hash and a series of apparently random characters that the service provider responds to with a redirect to the longer target link. For example, the provider tr.im may provide a link of the form http://tr.im/zpBD that points visitors to http://molecularvoices.molecular.com/category/data-and-analytics/, saving us 48 characters to talk about how insightful the latest blog post is.

The advantages to end users are clear enough, but the disadvantages to content providers are not. Cautionary tales of short URL service collapse have been floating around for years, but the message doesn’t mean much to the people socializing those millions of YouTube videos and Flickr photos. The people contributing all that traffic to your site aren’t as concerned as the marketing department with how long the link stays around; the internet zeitgeist waits for no one. As marketing professionals, here are a few things you should know to help you better understand short URLs and why you should consider owning your own short URLs to power your brand.

(more…)

November 3

Why Tracking “Engagement” is Critical to Accurately Measuring Return on Investment

Over the past couple of years, the digital world has transformed the way companies need to measure the return on their marketing and technology investments. Companies, especially marketers, have had to reevaluate their traditional methods for calculating return on investment (ROI) due to several factors:

  • The economy has forced many companies to strictly track the “return” on every dollar they spen.
  • Traditional ROI models do not reflect the value generated from new types of digital interactions consumers are using (e.g., social, mobile) to engage companies and their brands.
  • Consumer behaviors are changing so rapidly that current ROI models are becoming more and more irrelevant as time goes on.

Unfortunately, many companies are hesitant to invest in these new digital interactions despite their exponential growth with target consumers because they are unsure of how to measure their value to the organization. These companies run the risk of:

  • Being bypassed by competitors willing to make these types of investments in their consumers, even if a standard measurement method is not available.
  • Misappropriating their investments in consumer interactions and technologies that no longer meet the needs of their consumers.

So how should companies go about updating their traditional ROI models?

When reevaluating their current ROI models, companies need to remember four key points:

1. Incorporating engagement into the ROI calculation
Increasing consumer engagement is part of every company’s future success. So why haven’t companies already incorporated these metrics in their ROI calculations?

Some companies still track “return” simply in dollars and cents. Many companies in the retail banking industry have fallen into this trap. As functionality of Internet banking and 3rd party aggregation services (e.g., Mint.com) have vastly improved, retail banking consumers have lost nearly all personal engagement with their banks. By failing to incorporate engagement into their ROI or customer value models, a bank may not realize their ability to retain or increase the value of that customer relationship is extremely low. In some cases, a bank may think they have improved the value of the relationship because their cost of service has decreased as the consumer uses more online services.

Companies need to understand that “return” is no longer just about dollar and cents. The non-monetary value generated from consumer engagement is just as valuable (if not more in the digital world) than dollar value generated from these interactions. Engagement is also a great predictor of changes in financial contribution, customer acquisition and retention. Although, companies must remember to be patient as the correlation between engagement level and monetary value created or lost does not happen simultaneously. Companies must build positive engagement with consumers before they can expect to see increases in financial value or customer acquisition.

EngagementGIF

2. There is no standard method for measuring consumer engagement
There are many vendors in the market today that claim they have found the secret formula to measuring consumer engagement. Although the methods developed by these vendors have merit, there is no one method that is “one size fits all.” Companies needs to align the way they measure engagement and the interactions they track with their specific business objectives and the needs of it consumers.

3. New ROI models must be flexible
Consumer behaviors and the way they interact with a company are evolving more and more each day. Today, consumers use Twitter, Facebook and YouTube to interact with a brand. Tomorrow, there may be a wave of new methods for interacting with consumers. Therefore, building flexibility into the ROI model is critical to its long-term value to the organization.

4. Follow your existing business processes
Whether you want to measure the level of engagement from an online initiative or an offline one, the process for creating that measurement model remains the same. Companies need to focus on the following tasks:

  • Aligning its engagement objectives with its overall business objectives. These do not have to simply be monetary objectives.
  • Understanding the needs and behaviors of its consumers to identify the appropriate engagement channels or interactions.
  • Creating an engagement measurement and ROI model that aligns with the engagement objectives.
  • Testing, validating and revising the model based on results.

It is important to remember that measuring engagement and incorporating it into your ROI models is not merely a one-time task. It is a continuous process of reevaluating the inputs, outputs and formulas to ensure companies are accurately accessing the value generated from its marketing and technology investments.

October 14

How to Make Twitter Measurable

More than ever, hard numbers are necessary to demonstrate success; they are incontrovertible, easy to communicate, and can point out what is or is not working. For new media darling Twitter, marketers are finding more tools to help them understand how their efforts are performing.

There are five tools to consider, but first you have to know what to measure. Not all of the tools out there are going to be helpful. Some are introspective, looking at how the Twitter campaign is presented. Others are quantitative tools to analyze traffic, trends and follower count. First, make a measurement plan, noting what is important to the organization and how to justify the success of the campaign. What does success look like? What are the key things that need to happen? List these goals and then determine reliable tools to measure progress. 

Five Useful Tools for Tracking Twitter Success

  • TwInfluence. Track not only how many listeners you have, but also how concentrated your audience is, and the rate at which your campaign is growing.
  • TwitAlyzer. Measure your popularity, signal-to-noise ratio, and how many times you’re being cited. This is valuable if your aim is to become a thought leader. Twitalyzer also lets you tie into Google Analytics and collect information on site traffic coming from Twitter. This can provide insight into how the digital marketing channel is being influenced by a Twitter campaign.
  • TwitterFriends. Get detailed insight on who you’re interacting with on Twitter. This includes everything from a map indicating where your followers are to the average length of a given tweet. This helps provide clarity on who is responding, how frequently and the nature of these interactions. This information can be useful in the planning stages of a Twitter campaign, as well as tracking once the work is in progress.
  • Trendistic. Get an understanding of trends in Twitter. Enter a keyword and see how it is referenced in the space over time. It’s possible to see up to 180 days worth of information.
  • TweetEffect. Find out how individuals are reacting to your posts. By entering the user ID and clicking search, you get a summary of recent changes, as well as adds or losses based on specific tweets. It’s an excellent way to see what is resonating with followers and what is not. 

As more users flock to Twitter, developers are coming up with tools that enable marketers to measure a multitude of interactions. While the information may not be 100% accurate, it is close enough to accurately capture trends in the space.

September 30

Digital Equals Measurable

Isobar Global’s Dan Calladine is Molecular’s guest blogger.  If you have any questions for Dan, add a comment to any of his posts.  You can also follow Dan at http://digital-examples.blogspot.com/ or on Twitter @dancall.

I was at a media event in London recently when someone from the traditional media side (not my company, I should add) went into a big rant about ‘what is digital?’

I really don’t see where the confusion comes in. ‘Digital’ isn’t an abstract concept, like ‘Girl Power’; it’s pretty easy to define and visualise.

Are posters digital? Yes, if they’re digital posters
Is mobile digital? Yes, almost all mobile is through digital networks these days
Is press digital? Yes, if it’s online… & so on.

The main thing about ‘digital’ is that the content and data is transferred digitally, and this means that you can often collect it and count it. This is what I love about digital media – admittedly I’m a bit of a geek – we’re constantly finding new and unusual ways of measuring actual data, not just surveying people. (& that’s why Omniture, a digital measurement company was sold for $1.8bn last week.)

Some relatively random recent examples:

Video: Services like Visible Measures can track and aggregate the number of views of a video across all the major video platforms in the world – they were able to show that Thriller received 28m views across all sites in the week after Michael Jackson died.

Social Media: While the twitter user base is not demographically representative, the site provides lots of data that can be aggregated and analysed. At university we used to do content analysis on newspaper stories; content analysis on twitter can looks at hundreds of thousands of posts and return findings like 20% of tweets are related to brands or products, or 15% of tweets can be classified as ‘porn spam’.

Mobile: Mobile ad servers can show the direct response rates of mobile ads, and demonstrate that the average click rates on mobile ads are approximately half those of online ads. Of course the click is not the only reaction an ad is intended to create, but it does show that apps and content are likely to be more powerful communications devices with mobile, and luckily you can measure the popularity of different apps.

Finally, you can be very creative about what you measure, and get high-sample size results for the strangest things. The free dating site OkCupid did this last week with this study of the response rates to emails sent on their sites, based on the content of the emails.

“#1 – Be literate. Netspeak, bad grammar, and bad spelling are huge turn-offs. Our negative correlation list is a fool’s lexicon: ur, u, wat, wont, and so on. These all make a terrible first impression. In fact, if you count hit (and we do!) the worst 6 words you can use in a first message are all stupid slang.

 netspeak-chart-gif

Language like this is such a strong deal-breaker that correctly written but otherwise workaday words like don’t and won’t have nicely above average response rates (36% and 37%, respectively).

Interesting exceptions to the “no netspeak” rule are expressions of amusement. haha (45% reply rate) and lol (41%) both turned out to be quite good for the sender. This makes a certain sense: people like a sense of humor, and you need to be casual to convey genuine laughter. hehe was also a successful word, but much less so (33%).

Scientifically, this is because it’s a little evil sounding. So, in short, it’s okay to laugh, but keep the rest of your message grammatical and punctuated.”

That’s the thing about digital – so much is potentially measurable, and you can really start to have fun when you think about what to do with the data that you collect.

September 17

Mint.com + Quicken: Its Impact on How Banks Engage Their Customers

I had been an active user of account aggregation services for years before switching to Mint.com several months ago. I could not have been happier with the services, ease of use and functionality provided by Mint. From my first login, I knew it would not be long before Mint.com was acquired. Their business model, the value of its customer information and the level of customer loyalty they have generated could not go unnoticed.  My only hope was that it was not acquired by a bank that would turn its services into its own marketing platform (you know there were several suitors).  My wish was granted when Intuit announced it would purchase Mint this week.  But what does this mean for how banks manage and measure customer relationships going forward?

The level of engagement banks have with their customers has been continuously decreasing. As in-branch transactions continue to diminish, banks try to engage customers through other channels such as online banking and mobile. Unfortunately, these channels are primarily transactional, which makes it difficult for banks to engage customers in higher value interactions (cross-selling, etc.). 

Mint.com and Quicken were already negatively impacting the banking industry’s level of customer engagement. With the merger, that impact will only grow. Once Mint utilizes Quicken’s technology and implements bill pay and transfer functionality, banks will begin to lose ALL direct contact with their customers.  Customers will no longer have to log into their institution’s online banking system. As customers get tired of paying for ATM fees, high interest rates, etc. they will use Mint’s “Ways to Save” feature to find a better solution or product. Banking products will become completely commoditized and banks will compete only on price.

Unfortunately, most banks won’t realize the extent of this impact until it is too late. “Engagement” is not a primary measurement for most banks.  They calculate success of a customer relationship based on the number of products owned, average balances, net interest income, tenure, satisfaction and cost to serve.  In some cases, Mint will actually increase the value of customer to a bank. As a customer reduces their use of their bank’s channels, the bank’s cost of service will decrease. Although that customer is more profitable, their propensity to attrite and switch banks increases because they longer have a relationship with their bank beyond fees, interest rates, etc.

Banks need to quickly realize the impact of the merger between Intuit and Mint and develop new and innovative ways to engage their customers (online and offline) or risk becoming a faceless institution that competes only on price.

Technorati Profile

Browse posts by month

Browse by author

We're always looking for rockstars

Come take a look at careers with Molecular