December 12

Why Facebook Connect matters

The recently launched Facebook Connect has been getting a lot of attention, but largely for the wrong reasons. Yes, it means people can use their Facebook logins on other sites, which saves users time and reduces the registration barrier. And yes, it means that people can broadcast their activity on other sites to their friends on Facebook, which as we know is an excellent way to broaden reach and increase brand awareness. These are both good things.

But Facebook Connect means more than this. It’s likely a transformational moment.

Go to the new Citysearch beta and sign in using your Facebook account to see what I mean. On the old Citysearch and the many other sites that incorporate ratings and reviews, forums, tags, wikis, and other user-generated content, the wisdom of crowds succeeds because, in general, people trust the advice of strangers. If 50 people have rated a restaurant, a consumer is fairly comfortable relying on that judgment.

Only one thing is even more trustworthy: the opinions of people I actually know. And that’s why sites such as Yelp, TripAdvisor, and Netflix have been rolling out their own social networks. When I consider a restaurant, hotel, or movie, I benefit from seeing my friends’ ratings first and foremost. The problem is that this requires consumers to manually reconnect with all their friends on each of these sites – or take the risk of uploading their address book, which many are reluctant to do. As a result, the social networks on those individual sites are used by a small percentage of visitors. My network of friends (i.e., my social graph) as it exists on Facebook hasn’t been portable.

Facebook Connect opens the floodgates. As more people in my Facebook network sign in to Citysearch using their Facebook logins, I see their reviews automatically, without having to reconnect with them. Seeing more of my friends’ reviews translates into increased usage, increased contributions, and increased loyalty. As more sites implement Facebook Connect (or its rival Google Friend Connect), my network completely changes: It’s no longer a single place I go to (Facebook), but a posse that follows me around wherever I go. Every product, every service, every purchase consideration online can be strengthened by my network. They’re the angels on my shoulder, wherever I go online.

Before, people had to put in some labor to reap the benefits of having an online social network. But now the level of effort drops. The benefits across sites rise. The number of participants grows. And a tipping point is at hand.

Creative Commons License
The Why Facebook Connect matters by Molecular Voices, unless otherwise expressly stated, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.

Comments

  1. David Palmer said on December 12th, 2008

    I dropped in a facebook connect wordpress plugin (that is very experiemental) into one of my project blogs… and while the concept is quite interesting i think there’s an inherent danger here. it means vendor lock-in (the vendor being facebook). what if facebook stops becoming the darling of the social networking world? what if in a year or two something better comes along?

    tying our applications/sites/communities to another has a mono-culture-like danger… which is why i find it interesting that myspace has opted to go with an open stack (around openid)

  2. Glenn Barnett said on December 12th, 2008

    Beyond Facebook Connect integration, the next step would be to incoprorate “degrees of separation” (like Linkedin) to increase the size of the domain of “highly relevant opinions”.

    I’ve been waiting for Microsoft to take this approach to improve Xbox Live matchmaking quality for years.

  3. Steve Mulder said on December 12th, 2008

    Excellent point David, and I totally agree. While I love the potential of the portable social graph, it makes me very nervous that Facebook (or any one company) owns it. I’d feel much better if it were an independent third party. The trick, of course, is that Facebook has such momentum that it will be difficult for anyone else to succeed right now.

  4. chi flat irons said on July 11th, 2009

    Pretty good post. I just found your site and wanted to say that I have really enjoyed browsing your posts. In any case I’ll be subscribing to your blog and I hope you post again soon!

  5. metin2 yang said on November 20th, 2009

    Good points, I completely agree with David. Though I love the potential of the portable social graph, this is making me very nervous, operas (or any company) has it. I feel much better now, if it is an independent third party. Trick and, of course, etc, it will face is difficult, anyone can succeed.

  6. christian louboutin said on July 6th, 2010

    Excellent point David, and I totally agree. While I love the potential of the portable social graph, it makes me very nervous that Facebook (or any one company) owns it.

  7. herve leger said on August 22nd, 2010

    baidu
    [url="http://www.baidu.com"]baidu[/url]

Add a comment
Technorati Profile

Browse posts by month

Browse by author

We're always looking for rockstars

Come take a look at careers with Molecular