<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Facebook Protecting a Competitive Advantage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://molecularvoices.molecular.com/2008/facebook-protecting-a-competitive-advantage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://molecularvoices.molecular.com/2008/facebook-protecting-a-competitive-advantage/</link>
	<description>where conversation and digital minds meet</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 23:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://molecularvoices.molecular.com/2008/facebook-protecting-a-competitive-advantage/#comment-168</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 12:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://molecularvoices.molecular.com/2008/facebook-protecting-a-competitive-advantage/#comment-168</guid>
		<description>Another great article on this subject: 
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/8b6351e4-c843-11dc-94a6-0000779fd2ac.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='microid-mailto+http:sha1:89d5a94ac17d9448358a115910362b8c60cb708e'>Another great article on this subject:<br />
<a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/8b6351e4-c843-11dc-94a6-0000779fd2ac.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/8b6351e4-c843-11dc-94a6-0000779fd2ac.html</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://molecularvoices.molecular.com/2008/facebook-protecting-a-competitive-advantage/#comment-165</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 21:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://molecularvoices.molecular.com/2008/facebook-protecting-a-competitive-advantage/#comment-165</guid>
		<description>In a move that demonstrates they've been reading Molecular Voices, Google, Facebook and Plaxo have joined forces with DataPortability.org, a taskforce organized to address the issue of portable user data on the Internet.  Facebook engineer Benjamin Ling, LiveJournal creator Brad Fitzpatrick, and Plaxo's Joseph Smarr represent the three companies who have a vested interest in the future of user data.  The move links the representatives with "other bleeding edge consultants and representatives of smaller and in many cases more user-centric companies"

The story can be found here: http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/goog-fb-data.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='microid-mailto+http:sha1:c45ab1d60bd071b0c719ed3d49c7643f03fe4dff'>In a move that demonstrates they&#8217;ve been reading Molecular Voices, Google, Facebook and Plaxo have joined forces with DataPortability.org, a taskforce organized to address the issue of portable user data on the Internet.  Facebook engineer Benjamin Ling, LiveJournal creator Brad Fitzpatrick, and Plaxo&#8217;s Joseph Smarr represent the three companies who have a vested interest in the future of user data.  The move links the representatives with &#8220;other bleeding edge consultants and representatives of smaller and in many cases more user-centric companies&#8221;</p>
<p>The story can be found here: <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/goog-fb-data.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/goog-fb-data.php</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vinod</title>
		<link>http://molecularvoices.molecular.com/2008/facebook-protecting-a-competitive-advantage/#comment-164</link>
		<dc:creator>Vinod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 18:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://molecularvoices.molecular.com/2008/facebook-protecting-a-competitive-advantage/#comment-164</guid>
		<description>I generally agree on your comments on using a lock-in strategy to create competitive advantage. But maybe the example used, of recent events at Facebook, are not appropriate to demonstrate this.  
Facebook disabled Scoble's account. Now, does the user terms &#38; conditions at Facebook explicitly say that users cannot do such a thing? The cell phone company example is interesting. They implicitly state that they don't want you to go away by clearly stating a 'termination fee' - thus laying down things up front. But did Facebook do that? 

Creating a competitive advantage via user lock-in is a common strategy among services where achieving economies of scale is important to achieving profitability. But disabling/disconnecting a user who is avoiding to get locked in just sends the wrong signal. I agree with Steve's comments about actions alienating current Facebook users. If the Beacon fiasco was not enough, maybe this will encourage Facebook users to spend more time on other networks.

- Vinod</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='microid-mailto+http:sha1:18b0b5ba63350613c3779c08fdef6991041d93d3'>I generally agree on your comments on using a lock-in strategy to create competitive advantage. But maybe the example used, of recent events at Facebook, are not appropriate to demonstrate this.<br />
Facebook disabled Scoble&#8217;s account. Now, does the user terms &amp; conditions at Facebook explicitly say that users cannot do such a thing? The cell phone company example is interesting. They implicitly state that they don&#8217;t want you to go away by clearly stating a &#8216;termination fee&#8217; - thus laying down things up front. But did Facebook do that? </p>
<p>Creating a competitive advantage via user lock-in is a common strategy among services where achieving economies of scale is important to achieving profitability. But disabling/disconnecting a user who is avoiding to get locked in just sends the wrong signal. I agree with Steve&#8217;s comments about actions alienating current Facebook users. If the Beacon fiasco was not enough, maybe this will encourage Facebook users to spend more time on other networks.</p>
<p>- Vinod</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Karofsky</title>
		<link>http://molecularvoices.molecular.com/2008/facebook-protecting-a-competitive-advantage/#comment-163</link>
		<dc:creator>David Karofsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 13:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://molecularvoices.molecular.com/2008/facebook-protecting-a-competitive-advantage/#comment-163</guid>
		<description>Another issue to consider with vendor lock-in is the cost (i.e. $$ price) of switching. For example, cell phone providers have a significant price penalty for canceling a contract early thus greatly reducing the incentive for customers to switch providers. The same can be said for cable providers as well.

In addition, think about the cost of switching hardware and software providers in corporate data centers.  Creating vendor lock-in is a key corporate strategy for large system providers. IBM has built a business around Global Services and its ability to lock the vendor in its solutions. This reiterates Eric’s original comments about creating a key competitive advantage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='microid-mailto+http:sha1:76a6b9be817695dbdd3e3ce8d88da0ae9f0e6a5f'>Another issue to consider with vendor lock-in is the cost (i.e. $$ price) of switching. For example, cell phone providers have a significant price penalty for canceling a contract early thus greatly reducing the incentive for customers to switch providers. The same can be said for cable providers as well.</p>
<p>In addition, think about the cost of switching hardware and software providers in corporate data centers.  Creating vendor lock-in is a key corporate strategy for large system providers. IBM has built a business around Global Services and its ability to lock the vendor in its solutions. This reiterates Eric’s original comments about creating a key competitive advantage.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Mulder</title>
		<link>http://molecularvoices.molecular.com/2008/facebook-protecting-a-competitive-advantage/#comment-162</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Mulder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 17:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://molecularvoices.molecular.com/2008/facebook-protecting-a-competitive-advantage/#comment-162</guid>
		<description>Lock-in works as long as there's insufficient value to drive users to escape the locked-down experience. The risk for Facebook is that someone else will come along and enable users to take their social graph (contacts) with them. If I could enter my network one place, then access that network anywhere (Netflix, TripAdvisor, etc.), suddenly the switching costs become worth it, and Facebook could lose a ton of  usage and loyalty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='microid-mailto+http:sha1:54a60bbf48f802650963a7ce97623d6fbb4351a7'>Lock-in works as long as there&#8217;s insufficient value to drive users to escape the locked-down experience. The risk for Facebook is that someone else will come along and enable users to take their social graph (contacts) with them. If I could enter my network one place, then access that network anywhere (Netflix, TripAdvisor, etc.), suddenly the switching costs become worth it, and Facebook could lose a ton of  usage and loyalty.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
