<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Facebook really web 3.0?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://molecularvoices.molecular.com/2007/is-facebook-really-web-30/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://molecularvoices.molecular.com/2007/is-facebook-really-web-30/</link>
	<description>where conversation and digital minds meet</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 23:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eric Karofsky</title>
		<link>http://molecularvoices.molecular.com/2007/is-facebook-really-web-30/#comment-123</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Karofsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 12:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://molecularvoices.molecular.com/2007/is-facebook-really-web-30/#comment-123</guid>
		<description>re: linkedin... For the same reason that Facebook is beneficial because of "socialization without interaction", linkedin is a great application because it allows "networking without interaction". Linkedin seems to have a lower barrier to entry and lower barrier to maintain than Facebook.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='microid-mailto+http:sha1:430fecae872fdb751309f4080713f8174f52039f'>re: linkedin&#8230; For the same reason that Facebook is beneficial because of &#8220;socialization without interaction&#8221;, linkedin is a great application because it allows &#8220;networking without interaction&#8221;. Linkedin seems to have a lower barrier to entry and lower barrier to maintain than Facebook.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
